Given the voracity with which Hollywood will seize upon almost any existing intellectual property — video game! card game! product placement! sequel to product placement! spin-off from sequel to product placement! — and make it into a probably disappointing movie, it’s amazing that Clue (1985), based on one of the dullest board games in existence, turned out as well as it did.
You know the setup of course: six strangers are invited to an isolated country house where they are greeted by a butler, Wadsworth (Tim Curry), who tells them their mystery host will be joining them in due course. It swiftly becomes apparent that the six guests have all been given colourful pseudonyms — “Mr. Green” (Michael McKean), “Colonel Mustard” (Martin Mull), “Mrs. Peacock” (Eileen Brennan), “Professor Plum” (Christopher Lloyd), “Miss Scarlet” (Lesley Ann Warren, channelling Susan Sarandon), and “Mrs. White” (Madeleine Kahn) — and that they, a maid Yvette (Colleen Camp) and a cook (Kellye Nakahara) are the only people in the house.


Wadsworth then reveals that all six guests are victims of a blackmailer — who just so happens to be his employer, Mr. Boddy (Lee Ving) and has also been invited…and who makes them the offer of killing Wadsworth, who had been trying to encourage them to reveal their secrets to prosecute Boddy. Each person is given a weapon from the game — a candlestick, a dagger, a lead pipe, a revolver, a rope, and a wrench — and encouraged to kill Wadsworth to keep their secrets hidden. The lights go out, there’s a shot…and Boddy himself is discovered dead on the floor. Whodunnit?


From here, following a slightly protracted setup, the unfolding mayhem is handled magnificently, not only by Lynn’s excellent script — the story was devised by Lynn with John Landis, whose mojo deserted him the second the 1980s ended — but also by the staggeringly game cast. Plenty of high-energy running and screaming, and more than a little excellent wordplay…
WADSWORTH:
He’s working on the secret of the next fusion bomb.COLONEL MUSTARD:
How did you know that?WADSWORTH:
Can you keep a secret?COLONEL MUSTARD:
Yes…WADSWORTH:
So can I.
…and the joyous inclusion of secret passages as would be found on the board adds to the carnage of another four deaths, as extra characters appear, are swiftly dispatched, and there seems to be simply no way that any sense can be made from the chaos.


Famously, when shown in the cinema, different screens were given prints with different endings, so your understanding of the solution depended on which of the three you saw. This in a way highlights the flaw of the film as pure detection — there’s no key clue in any case, essentially requiring the murderer to confess to tie everything up — but as a piece of entertainment, it’s delightful. Curry is easily the MVP of the last third (“I know because I was there.”), throwing himself and others around with ludic abandon, and the repeated lines (“Communism was just a red herring…”) adding to the fun of seeing the three different conclusions presented one after another, as how now become customary for the film.


As a piece of four-decades-old media, it has its problems — the men are all letches, the women are harridans or harlots — but the essential anarchy of its premise, and the way that the conclusion comes down to a guessing game just as it would most of the time in the game itself, is delightful. Especially clever is Lynn’s blocking as a director, enabling his ensemble to appear present when in fact there’s always the key person(s) absent to allow for any of those endings. Hell, it even occurred to me on this rewatch, about the fifth time I’ve seen it, that with a small tweak another solution could be possible. So if the producers of the rumoured — and thoroughly unneeded — remake want to come at me with a cheque book, I’ll make it worth your while.


Forty years on, Clue remains a zestful, spirited, wildly entertaining time that rewards your patience in the opening 20 minutes with fillip after fillip in the final run that knocks the stymied creativity of most murder mysteries these days into a cocked hat (?). As I say, it’s not detection — it’s ipsedixitism raised to an art form, complete with murders and more exuberant abandon than a roomful of caffeinated puppies — but the joy and wit and intelligence on display really is something to behold. Don’t remake it, just re-release it: new generations deserve to experience this on the big screen, and I’ll watch it a sixth and a seventh time and chortle all the way through as I did on this encounter.


~
All stills in this post are taken from Movie-Screencaps.com. Many thanks to them for making available that which I was unable to procure myself.
~
There’s also a novelisation of the film, which is lots of fun as well…

I believe there is indeed another solution in the novelisation, but considering buying a copy would take a King’s ransom, I don’t recommend you search it out just on my say-so
LikeLike
Huh, really? That’s brilliant! Many thanks for telling me, I’ll look into this and see what I can find out.
LikeLike
I found it!
LikeLike
Well, that’s torn it, gotta watch this again ASAP. Those darn Commies … Thanks Jim 👍
LikeLike
Communism was just a red herring, Sergio…
LikeLike
🤪
LikeLike
It’s a shame the movie gives us its worst jokes in the opening twenty minutes. Once the plot gets set in motion, it’s a lot of fun — though how much is due to the writing and how much is due to the cast is questionable.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, getting through that opening crawl is the challenge here, I agree. And most of the success of what follows is undoubtedly down to the excellent cast; structurally the film offers little that’s interesting or notable, but it feels fresh and fun even after five watches because of how gamely everyone commits to it.
LikeLike
I love this film and watch it fairly often. One of my favourite bits:
“He threatened to kill me in public”
“Why would he want to kill you in public?”
LikeLike
Just got round to rewatching it and had a great time – worth pointing out that among its many unusual aspects is that, two extra endings aside, it plays out in real time. Which is still very unusual (and does impose very teal limitations of course) – but it is a neat idea as it brings it closer to the essence of offering a movie correlative to the experience of playing the board game. The music score gives it plenty of bounce but even that can’t keep up with Tim Curry – he is sublime throughout.
LikeLike
Good spot about the real time aspect, I’d not considered that. And, yes, Curry is magnificent — difficult to imagine it working without him.
LikeLiked by 1 person