#364: An Egyptian Chinese Puzzle in The Mystery of the Whispering Mummy (1965) by Robert Arthur

Whispering Mummy

So, here I am in the throes of a month of Tuesdays posts looking at GAD-era YA novels and — boom! — here’s a YA novel on a Saturday?!  What on earth…?

You will, I’m sure, cope.

This is the third of the Alfred Hitchcock and Three Investigators series of books, and I realised one thing very quickly: I remember virtually nothing about the preceding story, The Mystery of the Stuttering Parrot (1964), which I read last September.  Even going back and rereading my own post about that book brings very little to memory…apparently there’s a yegg in it and I liked him, and something about parrots that say things having been named (in most cases) after famous figures in literature.  Well, the good news is that while this cadre of books don’t fall chronologically in the Golden Age — even my arms-open approach to those limiting dates doesn’t encompass 1965 — they carry over very little in the way of changes from book to book.  So Jupe still lives on a junkyard run by his aunt and uncle, who have failed to notice the investigators’ Headquarters and its myriad tunnel entrances…that’s probably all you ever need.

This time, Jupe, Pete, and Bob get a break from “investigating how much work three boys could do on a hot day” with two competing offers of a case — the first in tracking down a lady’s missing cat (those parrot-finding skills perhaps more relevant than I first imagined…), and the second a summons from Alfred Hitchcock to discover how a 3,000 year-old mummy can possibly be whispering to the archaeologist who has it on loan from an Egyptian museum.  They contemplate for all of zero seconds and head for the hills, and encounter rumours of a curse stalking the members of the party who first uncovered the tomb…

Whispering Mummy (1)

Stuff like this keeps happening, see…

The casual desecration of the honoured burial rights of an ancient civilisation are quietly glossed over here, and instead of any moral conundra we have a far more crowd-pleasing threat of death:

“Lord Carter died in an automobile accident.  Aleph Freeman … was murdered in a Cairo bazaar.  The photographer and Lord Carter’s personal secretary were injured in the accident that killed Lord Carter.  The Egyptian overseer of the labour force died of a snake bite.”

Opinion naturally divides as to whether a curse exists or not, but the use of the name Lord Carter is inevitably designed to bring to mind the “Curse of Tutankhamun” stories following the discovery of his tomb in 1915.  There’s nothing egregiously disrespectful about this — hell, everyone has their own “Wow, I can’t believe they used that as the basis for a GAD novel…” example — but I find it interesting that Arthur’s use of this name in particular must be deliberate given that the intended audience would be about the age one is when first learning of the Valley of the Kings (at least, I was).

Pleasingly, Arthur has put quite a lot of background into the finding of this mummy — it was buried secretly and with little in the way of ceremony, seemingly possessed of very little of any worth, and there are even doubts as to precisely when this burial took place.  Even its origins are somewhat in question: the name of the person whose tomb it was — read from an inscription over the tomb, the translation of which gives rise to questions over the supposed curse — hints at both Libyan and Egyptian antecedents, with the ‘Ra’ prefix of Ra-Orkon hinting at Egyptian nobility.  Frankly, the story in no way needs these details, but it would be a poorer, much less enriched and so enjoyable, experience without them.  I like the idea of the element of mystery behind the mystery, as well as the intelligence behind even simple things like names and wordplay: everything counts, everything can contribute to the understanding of a situation or the escalation of a puzzle.  That’s an important detail, and one that often gets neglected outside of the masters of this form.

What develops from here is deceptively simple and clear: Ra-Orkon can’t be whispering, but Jupe’s initial suggestion as to how this effect was achieved is proven false and so more investigating is required.  How much there is in terms of pure clewing is debatable — well, no, it isn’t, as there is none — but at the halfway stage things become decidedly more complex when a third party enters the fray claiming an interest in the mummy, and I’m hoping this layering of different elements is something that comes into play more regularly as these books progress.  Once you get to the end and realise how all the different aspects of the case collide — well, okay, you’ll realise it before you get to the end — it emerges as a pretty solid puzzle for the younger set, even if the page count is bolstered somewhat by an accidental kidnapping and then lots of searching for a thing.

Sure, there’s the odd reach — Arthur clearly doesn’t have much faith in the moral scruples of manual labourers — and this is packed with difficulties enough to the extent that I seriously doubt anyone is reading it and thinking Man, I sure do hope Skinny Norris turns up soon…, but it’s definitely a marked step up from the first two and I’ll remember this several years from now for the clarity of its central premise and the winding of the various threads around each other.  As an introduction to puzzle plotting, I would have loved this as a kid (and, in fairness, I rather enjoyed it as an adult-sized person).  The answer to the impossibility of the whispering mummy doesn’t, I’m pretty sure, work — it requires a reversal of entropy for one thing — and the eventual motive behind it all is devastatingly bland, but then the answers to a couple of questions come the end are rather delightful (the miraculous arrival of the cavalry in the right place at the right time, for instance…c’mon, that’s not a spoiler).

Whispering Mummy (2)

The plotting is superb, then, and the writing showing significant signs of improvement.  Equally, the boys themselves are starting to develop personalities — poor Pete, sidelined to look for that missing cat, is “human enough to want to get ahead of Jupe just once”, and you’re a cold fish indeed if you can’t raise a smile at Bob suspecting the household staff because “he had read many mysteries in which the butler had turned out to be the criminal”.  Even Jupe gets a moment of reader-insert self-awareness when he remarks at the need for keeping the adults around them in the dark: “I’ve noticed that adults can’t help trying to be helpful when they learn a boy is engaged upon some important project, and often they spoil everything”.  Wise words indeed, and ones that bode well for the future of this series as I continue to work through them chronologically.

Next up for the boys is The Mystery of the Green Ghost (1965)…but since that’s one of the titles I don’t possess — and if I can’t find an affordable copy of the Armada edition before the desire to delve in hits me again — I may have to skip ahead to The Mystery of the Vanishing Treasure (1966).  Wow, this almost feels like an adventure all of my very own…watch this space!


See also:

TomCat @ Beneath the Stains of Time: Jupe has a trick up his sleeve to make the mummy whisper in his presence, but finds himself confronted with somewhat of a locked room problem when the ruse succeeds: mummy begins to murmur when “he was totally alone” and “the door into the room where the professor and Bob waited was shut.” Nobody was near the mummy case to “throw” his voice and the possibility of a radio transmitter had already been eliminated. I was a bit skeptical about the actual explanation for this locked room mystery, because it seemed out-of-time, but consulting the all-knowing Internet revealed this was technically possible since the early 1960s. So the trick was technically possible. [Editor’s note: I still don’t completely buy it…]


Previous Alfred Hitchcock and the Three Investigators books on The Invisible Event:

1. The Secret of Terror Castle (1964) by Robert Arthur

2. The Mystery of the Stuttering Parrot (1964) by Robert Arthur

20 thoughts on “#364: An Egyptian Chinese Puzzle in The Mystery of the Whispering Mummy (1965) by Robert Arthur

  1. This one does sound more enjoyable than the last – there’s probably an equation to describe by what order of magnitude whispering mummies beat out parrots for interest and excitement. As for reversing entropy – no problem. Yportne. World’s problems solved.

    Liked by 2 people

    • You make an excellent point: a series that goes Sinister Castle, Missing Parrot, Egyptian Mummy, Vengeful Ghost, Amazing Treasure, Skeleton Island, Firey Eye, etc definitely took a nose-dive in its second instalment.

      Also, thanks for solving that entropy problem. Easy when you know how. I shall get in touch with everyone who sciences for a living and let them know. Boy, will their faces be red…

      Liked by 1 person

      • Come now, wasn’t it actually called “The Stuttering Parrot”? And when you’re ten years old, parrots are cool because they can speak and they belong to pirates.

        In Swedish, they’re so cool that the book was simply called “The Riddle of the Parrot”. No adjectives needed whatsoever!


        • I thought Stieg Larsson, Henning Mankell and Sjöwall/Wahlöö already told you everything about Swedish life…


          • Don’t recall any parrots in Mankell. He’s not going to waste space on something colourful that could instead be grey, slow, lugubrious, probably emotionally stunted, cold, disappointed with its life, and fond of long-winded introspection. While drunk. And hunting war criminals.

            Sjowall/Wahloo would want to transfer the parrot into public ownership as a way of proving the falsity of all human endeavour when directed towards the possession of anything that ight be joyful. The parrot would be passed from hand to hand, in the process of which it would pick up a million bacteris and die, in pain, from something tragic and incurable. Nobody would attend the funeral, because any interactions anyone had with the bird were too brief to contain any meaning, and the illusion of a joy unexperienced would simply crush their spirits more.

            As for Larsson…let’s just hope it’s a male parrot, because otherwise I shudder to think what that screwed up individual would have visited upon it…


  2. Glad to hear you’re having a good time here and I recall this entry as one of the better ones in the series, although the details are, as ever, somewhat sketchy these days. Green Ghost is, I think OK, and I have fond memories of Vanishing Treasure. Then you have Skeleton Island to look forward to, a book that held 10-year-old me absolutely enthralled and kind of scared too – it’s terrific.

    Liked by 1 person

    • I very much feel that 10 year-old me missed out on this brand of excited nostalgia; I read some Terry Pratchett and a lot of guff at that age…these and their ilk passed me by until I came upon the rebranded, new Nancy Drew series and then I devoured tons of those…about which I remember preicsely zilch (one of them has a scene towards the end that takes place in a shed near a beach with a sort of concrete runway or something…yup, that’s it).

      Old Me is furious with Young Me that he didn’t choose better when at that formative age; just think of all the Tom Clancy I could have avoided…


      • I think I have a few years, at least, on you and that may be art of the reason you didn’t get into the books at that age. When I was growing up in the 70s these books, as well as the Hardy Boys and Nancy Drew, were always in the bookshops and the libraries so they were a natural choice. I read Clancy and the like too, but that was when I got older.
        Actually, I think I was lucky in that I grew up at a time when this kind of material was not only readily available but popular with my peers, so liking it was something that could be shared and so on.


        • It’s definitely true that what I was reading about the age of 10 was what my peers were recommending…and that this kind of stuff wasn’t (to my knowledge) available as an option. One of the reasons to be so excited about ebooks — you can recommend something to someone and, a lot of the time now, they can find an electronic version PDQ.

          Admittedly, not these books, it would seem…but at least 3 people are selling The Mystery of the Green Ghost for a mere £900 + P&P. So that will help spread the word.


          • I remember commenting, on that piece about used book pricing, that 3I books can on occasion be priced a insane levels. That, however,passes easily into the realms of the gibbering.
            If even some of the more conservative prices were anything to go by, it would appear that my mostly hardback collection must be worth a fortune! Actually, I’d love to fill in a few gas in that collection but I’ve no intention of playing the game some of these sellers seem to think is acceptable.

            Liked by 1 person

  3. I don’t want to unduly worry you, but I begin to fear the fabric of reality is slowly disintegrating, because this is the third time in a row that we’re in agreement! This one definitely ranks alongside The Secret of Skeleton Island, The Mystery of the Shrinking House and The Mystery of the Headless Horse as one of the better titles in this series.

    Yes, the locked room trick is not entirely convincing, however, it was technically possible at the time. So, I can’t really complain about it.


    • Man, the world is weird at the moment. I’m so sued to one of us being wrong about something that I don’t know what to ake of this current state of affaits. Maybe I should reread this one or soemthing…? 🙂


  4. Currently re-reading the Three Investigators books I have (aside from Terror Castle since I’ve already read that one many more times than the rest). Mine are the 1960s Random House hardcovers.

    I don’t have Stuttering Parrot so I went on to Whispering Mummy. I thought this one was good, my only difficulty with it being the enormous amount of trouble the perpetrator went to just to set up a scapegoat, which didn’t seem necessary given that nobody alive was aware of his having any potential motive.


    • Yes, the contortions certain villains go to would be a downfall if these took place in the real world…but we’re in Three Investigators Land, so that never worries me too greatly 🙂 So long as I believe it from the boys’ perspective, I’m usually pretty happy with that sort of thing.

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.