#1333: “Why shouldn’t I know? I know how people act, don’t I?” – My Mother, the Detective [ss] (2016) by James Yaffe

I first encountered James Yaffe via his story ‘The Problem of the Emperor’s Mushrooms’ (1945), but have heard much about his ‘Mom’ stories, in which a police officer’s mother “is usually able to solve over the dinner table crimes that keep the police running around in circles for weeks”. So I was delighted to acquire the complete collection of those tales.

The nine stories here — eight originally published in Ellery Queen Mystery Magazine between 1952 and 1968, plus an extra one written for Crippen & Landru, the publishers of this collection — cover a range of mystery subgenres, and, in the best tradition to grow out of the Golden Age, utilise some extremely clever ideas without ever retreading too much ground. So, taking them one at a time, we have…

We begin with ‘Mom Knows Best’ (1952), concerning the murder of a woman of low virtue in her hotel room. Our narrator David (I don’t think we ever learn his last name) is convinced that one of three men who called on Vilma Degrasse that evening is responsible…but which one? This sort of armchair detection is always delightful to watch when done well, and Yaffe does a superb job here, making Mom’s unpicking of the tale feel very achievable — the lipstick deduction is ingeniously placed as a piece of clewing — and her son not seem like an idiot for overlooking the key details.

It makes perfect sense that someone would write this and then want to go on and write a bunch more. Hell, I’d be very excited to stumble unexpectedly across this in an old EQMM, and it’s a great first taste to get you intrigued for what is to follow.

An impossible poisoning confronts us in ‘Mom Makes a Bet’ (1953). How could a bowl of soup which was made to order and tasted by the restaurant’s owner before being served possibly poison the man who it was put in front of mere moments later?

The Miss Marpleness of Mom is brought out a little more here (“This Grady, he reminds me of a cousin of your late father…”) and again the nature of the deductions flows effortlessly, leaning neatly both into information provided openly and that which could be readily called common knowledge. Perhaps its gender politics haven’t aged well…

Women are all the same; even in the middle of a murder case they can’t get their minds off irrelevant details like food and housekeeping…

…but otherwise this is another superb little puzzle, glorious building on the Golden Age’s tradition.

An attempt to set Mom up with a police colleague of David’s parallels a case of a lonely hearts killer in ‘Mom in the Spring’ (1954). It’s a fairly standard story until you get to some of the key psychology in the closing stages, which elevates it above the routine fare you might have been experiencing to that point. And the bit about the Empire State Building is exactly the sort of content I’m here for.

“[A]ll the indications are that little five-year-old Kenneth Fisher is a murderer,” says David early on in ‘Mom Sheds a Tear’ (1954), and the case is a pretty affecting one: the child appearing to have pushed the uncle he’s scared is trying to take his deceased father’s place in the home off the roof to his death.

I’m…less convinced by the psychology of this, despite Yaffe doing some stalwart work to make it all join up. Perhaps it’s the over-reliance on psychological detection — never a favourite approach of mine — or maybe it’s that some of the ideas dismissed herein feel too easily dismissed, I dunno; but this is merely good without being excellent. Imagine that.

It’s Mom’s birthday in ‘Mom Makes a Wish’ (1955), and so of course the conversation turns to the murder of a college professor, found beaten to death with a whisky bottle dropped nearby, suspicion immediately falling on an ex-colleague who, having lost both his wife and job, has turned to drink as a way to cope. But if the man isn’t guilty, why won’t he tell the police where he really was at the time of the crime?

I liked this, with the first deduction that occurs to Mom being a strong one, and the psychology behind those secretive actions well-motivated. Yaffe also folds in the real guilty party and the motive in a way that completely passed me by, and so made for a clever payoff in the final stages.

When one opera-lover seems to poison another in an argument over who is the best soprano in the world (the answer is Renata Tebaldi, btw), Dave is thoroughly confounded: not by who must the guilty, nor the method used, but by the simple fact that no D.A. in the country is going to get up in front of a jury and convince them that such a disagreement could ever be the motive for murder. This is the problem that confronts us in ‘Mom Sings an Aria’ (1966).

While Mom’s insistence that “To solve this case you have to think like an opera lover” doesn’t quite carry the same weight as G.K. Chesterton’s reflections on judges and poets, there’s a good clue in the midst of this, and the argument inevitably put forward to resolve Dave’s issues is solid…though you can’t help but wonder how the killer expected to get away scot-free. Still, a firm, sensible puzzle plot from an era that did not celebrate such ideas, so let’s not cavil too loudly.

‘Mom and the Haunted Mink’ (1967) finds Davie, Shirley, and Mom out for dinner at a restaurant, where the ever-brewing discontent between mother and daughter-in-law sees some distraction needed and so the story of Laura McCloskey’s haunted coat is trotted out. The problem is a good one, too, with an apparently ghostly curse seeing the mink behave in stranger and stranger ways, and Shirley leaning in a psychological direction (“Subconsciously Mrs. McCloskey rejected and despised the materialistic side of her nature…”) that it feels crime fiction started to take as its True North more and more in this era.

The eventual solution isn’t bad but, like some of Paul Halter’s o’er-reaching stories, tying such a wide range of activities into one simple explanation is always going to underwhelm. The deduction about the box is brilliant in its minor stature, though, and ties up a slightly woolly tale very neatly.

‘Mom Remembers’ (1968) might as well be called ‘Mom: Origins’, since we go back to her very first case…one that happened to involve her husband on the very morning they were due to get married…and which her own mother untangled.

The use of dual timelines here is very clever, and the drawing of parallels between the two works surprisingly well, the much greater length of this perhaps presaging the leap to novels that the character would make in four books published between 1988 and 1992. Yaffe’s emotive writing is powerful, too — effective without being schmaltzy, and once again bringing great life to what could otherwise be an easy archetype.

It was, if I understand correctly, the collection of the preceding stories which saw Yaffe recalled to this series — in short form — with ‘Mom Lights Candle’ (2002), an excellent little mystery set several years after the others (I don’t know how this ties into the novels, and will hope to find out in the years ahead). The shooting of an unwelcome relative over Hanukah raises the prospect of just how many people disliked him enough to want him dead…and, once more, Mom’s canny psychology saves the day.

There’s also a nice late twist here, and a nifty closing fillip, making it feel like Yaffe has finally achieved the ending he wants for these characters. And that’s a lovely feeling to go out on, not least because of how enjoyable it’s been to spend time in this setup. A wonderful body of work, and wonderful to think he got to end it on his own terms.

So, a top five in a collection with only nine stories? Sure, why not?

  1. ‘Mom Makes a Bet’ (1953)
  2. ‘Mom Lights Candle’ (2002)
  3. ‘Mom Makes a Wish’ (1955)
  4. ‘Mom in the Spring’ (1954)
  5. ‘Mom Remembers’ (1968)

Overall, these stories are an excellent example of the crime writer’s art, with the narrow tramlines the characters operate between being perfectly drawn up so that the limitations of this style of catch-and-release storytelling are explored fully and to wonderful effect. It feels a little as if Yaffe is veering into parody at times, but it’s also to be commended how strongly you get a sense of his characters in what are, after all, pretty plot-heavy undertakings that rarely waste much time in setup, exploration, or explanation.

I’m intrigued to see how the characters made a leap to novel-length stories, too: does Mom become more active in her investigations, or are the puzzles sufficiently dense that David is able to bring her a new facet on successive days, always to be discussed in the comfort of home? My understanding of the chronology is below, and I’ll update these to links as, if, and when I’m able to find the titles in question. All told, however, this is an excellent collection in which James Yaffe really does show off how mystery writing can be deployed as an art form at the highest level; how lucky we were to have him.

~

The ‘Mom’ novels by James Yaffe:

  1. A Nice Murder for Mom (1988)
  2. Mom Meets Her Maker (1990)
  3. Mom Doth Murder Sleep (1991)
  4. Mom Among the Liars (1992)

14 thoughts on “#1333: “Why shouldn’t I know? I know how people act, don’t I?” – My Mother, the Detective [ss] (2016) by James Yaffe

  1. Told you it was good! My review of this collection is my personal pick for one of the best written posts on my blog, I am very proud of it. I think our thoughts align almost entirely, especially on “Mom Makes a Bet” being the best! I’m ecstatic you finally got around to reading this and enjoying it.

    Like

    • You did! And I listened!

      These really are the sort of thing I’m looking for in my detection short stories: well-reasoned, well-structured, often with motives hidden in plain sight. Now I just need to find someone else who does it as well…

      Like

  2. This sounds fun. A quick look in the usual places online show prices for used copies are few and expensive. Nevertheless, I enjoyed Yaffe’s “Mom Meets Her Maker” so will put this collection on my want list. I have found that unless I buy a given Crippen & Landru title within months of it being published, it can become elusive and pricey in the second-hand market.

    Like

    • Yes, I wonder if C&L have the rights to produce perhaps a certain number of each volume, or if costs — and the uncertainty of sales — mean that they’re only willing to print so many lest they not make their money back. A very sensible policy, if so, but it does make picking up these collections years down the line somewhat tricky.

      I, however, got very lucky finding this, and hope you’re able to track it down before too long. Great stories, and I look forward to the novels most eagerly.

      Like

  3. Love these stories. The true descendant of Miss Marple and her Tuesday Night Club, imo.

    I was going to point readers to the ebook version, but this appears to have vanished from sale! C+L seem to be quite picky about what they choose to sell as ebooks lately. I can only hope Am*z*n doesn’t pry it off my ereader.

    Like

    • They were a joy, and I’m saddened to know that this is all the shorts and there are only the novels — assuming I can track them down — to come.

      Still, these will also stand up to rereading in a few years, so I suppose there’s always that.

      And, yes, here’s hoping your version doesn’t vanish into the e-air. A tragedy indeed were that to happen.

      Like

  4. I keep records (albeit unreliable and inconsistent – read on, you’ll see) on the books I read and, according to my Calibre database, the four Mom novels have all been 4/5.

    But thanks to your review JJ, I realise I’ve only read three.

    I’d somehow managed to record My Mom The Detective as a novel, when now I remember that it was the short stories that got me onto the novels.

    At least it means I’ve got A Nice Murder For Mom to find and enjoy.

    Like

    • Good to know they’re of a comparable, and consistent, standard — many thanks.

      And, wow, lucky you — discovering another novel in a favourite series. That we were all so lucky! Enjoy!

      Like

  5. This is indeed a great collection, a classic even, that should have been collected and published decades earlier. So glad you enjoyed it and even gladder to see the general consensus on “Mom Makes a Bet.”

    I have only read one of the Mom novels, Mom Meets Her Maker, which is a good, fun Christmas mystery done the American way. Where it differed from the short stories is that Yaffe moved Mom and Dave from New York to Mesa Grande, Colorado, where Dave works for the public defender’s office. So you get to see Dave actually do the legwork instead of him telling about over the dinner table. Other than that, Mom Meets Her Maker has all the same qualities as the short stories and recommend it for the coming holidays.

    By the way, I know they’re inferior to the Mom short stories, but hope C&L decided to collect the Department of Impossible Crimes series that Yaffe wrote as a teenager.

    Like

    • Like most people, I think the only Paul Dawn story I’ve read is ‘Emperor’s Mushrooms’ — I presume the others have been reprinted elsewhere, but tracking them down is likely to be a pain. Could be fun to see the enthusiasm the youthful Yaffe brought to the best genre in the world, however, so, yes, if anyone wants to collect and reprint them they have my blessing 🙂

      Thanks for the reassurance about the novel, too; if I can find it before Christmas, I’l certainly give it a go.

      Like

  6. If I recall I too “told you so” about Mom! (Though maybe it was someone else I blabbed about it to…?)

    But I absolutely love these, and my favorite is Mom Remembers- because I’m not just Jewish but, on my dad’s side at least, from exactly the milieu that Mom is remembering (Lower East Side of Manhattan- I believe you’re British so the equivalent would be London’s East End). My family is also religious, and while it’s implied that Davie, Shirley, and Mom are only kinda-sorta by the time of the story, Yaffe’s depiction of a couple from religious Jewish LES families (and the various tensions resulting) was excellent, and the fact that the “case in the past”‘s key clue ended up circling around (ROT13) ure svnapr/uhfonaq’f funzr ng rngvat ng n aba-xbfure erfgnhenag, nf jryy nf nyy bs gur phygheny pbagrkg pyhrf gung nyybj ure (be engure ure zbgure) gb svther vg bhg was just unspeakably perfect. It was completely and totally believable and I’ve always wondered what people not familiar with the cultural context think of that bit.

    I’m so glad you read them and enjoyed!

    Like

    • ACTUALLY- while I’m here, I do have a problem with the final story, the one in Mesa Grande. It’s not that the case is solved wrong, it’s the final coda, and it’s annoying, because the story is overall VERY good at using details of Jewish ritual well but does get one thing wrong (besides the insinuation that candlelighting takes a long time, because it can take as little as 1-2 minutes if you don’t do all the singing).

      Anyway, here’s my quibble, no need to translate from ROT13 unless you’re really curious:

      Zbz fnlf gung gur BAYL ernfba jul Enoov Obfxl jbhyq unir yvg nyy gur pnaqyrf vf nf n “jnl bs pryroengvat” be fbzrguvat yvxr gung. Svefg bs nyy, V qba’g ernyyl trg gur ybtvpny pbaarpgvba orgjrra svavfuvat gur yvtugvat naq pryroengvat gur zheqre- V guvax vg’f n yrnc. Ohg zber fvtavsvpnagyl… Enoov Obfxl nyernql znqr gur oyrffvat ba gur pnaqyrf, fb ur UNF gb svavfu yvtugvat gur pnaqyrf. Ur pna’g tb qbjafgnvef naljnl gb uryc, naq gurer vf n cevapvcyr va Wrjvfu ynj gung bapr lbh unir znqr gur oyrffvat orsber shysvyyvat n pbzznaqzrag, lbh zhfg shysvyy gur npgvba cebzcgyl. Va gur ren va juvpu guvf fgbel vf frg, Enoov Obfxl nf n Pbafreingvir enoov jbhyq or rkcrpgrq gb or njner bs Wrjvfu ynj va guvf ertneq (va snpg, znal Pbafreingvir enoovf npghnyyl unq Begubqbk beqvangvba, juvpu jbhyq tvir gurz abg whfg gur xabjyrqtr ohg gubebhtu Gnyzhqvp onpxvat va gur cevapvcyrf) naq fb vg jbhyq znxr ab frafr sbe uvz ABG gb yvtug gur pnaqyrf.

      Naq, yvxr, rira vs ABG sbe nyy gung, jung FUBHYQ Enoov Obfxl unq qbar? Whfg fng gurer naq vtaberq gung gur yvtugvat unq fgnegrq? Gurl’q nyernql fgnegrq jvgu gur pnaqyryvtugvat! V guvax guvf jnf n ovt yrnc sebz Zbz, naq vs fur’f tbvat gb fbyir pevzrf gunaxf gb xabjyrqtr bs Wrjvfu ynj naq phfgbz gura gung arrqf gb jbex va obgu qverpgvbaf.

      Like

      • Given how accurate Yaffe usually is about this stuff, I wonder if there was a narrative reason for this oversight. I can’t think of one, and it might be something to do with keeping the word count down since this would have originally been issued as a booklet with the collection when C&L first printed it. I don’t know for sure, but you raise an interesting point.

        Alas, Yaffe died in 2017, so we can’t ask him. Thus, all we have left to us is speculation!

        Like

    • You were indeed one of the people who “told me” about these; I’m not always quick, but all recommendations stick and I get to them eventually 🙂

      I’m interested in the novels, but finding them will probably take a while; I got very lucking finding this collection, and thankfully have much to read in the meantime, but I’ll definitely be looking out for those four books. Hopefully to do in order…

      Like

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.