Spoiler Warning – Towards Zero (1944) by Agatha Christie

Hopefully your summer heatwave — or winter freeze-wave — has passed and you’re calm, relaxed, and ready to listen to Brad, Moira, and me discuss some Agatha Christie in spoiler-filled detail. This time we’re talking about Towards Zero (1944), the fifth and final book to feature Superintendent Battle.

Is there much to discuss in advance? Not really. We all liked this, which makes a change, despite the fact that it walks a very delicate line between telling you exactly enough for your brain to fill in any gaps but also not quite enough for it to be completely satisfying. Anyhoo, we’ll get into that, and you can see whether you agree.

You can listen to the podcast on iTunes here, on Spotify here, or on Stitcher here, or by using the player below. 

My thanks, as always, to Brad, to Moira, and to yourselves, dear listeners. The next, potentially final, Spoiler Warning discussion will be Mrs. McGinty’s Dead (1952) in October. See you then for that!

5 thoughts on “Spoiler Warning – Towards Zero (1944) by Agatha Christie

  1. Love it! Look forward to Mrs McGinty. How about, in return for free editing, you offer a chance to join in? Just a two-minute comment, perhaps! Or if you need someone to sing “hickory dickory dock”!

    Like

    • A nice idea, but I can’t believe anyone is that eager to appear on this podcast 🙂 Guest slots are usually saved for something reputable.

      Like

  2. Good discussion. I vote for the series to continue in the interest of the greater good. Do all podcasts do lots of editing? Maybe there is some software that can make it easier. Turning to the book:

    Would Mr Treves even have needed an identifying mark? He knew SIr Matthew, and he knew the events of the childhood murder. Did he not know that Sir Matthew became the guardian of the boy? And of course, it is odd that they start thinking about the physical mark instead of starting to investigate the childhoods of the characters. Audrey and Thomas grew up together, they could vouch that the impossibility of either being the murderer probably. (“No of course it can’t be Audrey, her family have lived there for generations and I have seen the photos of her as a baby with her parents.”)

    MacWhirter’s lies are a rather stark contrast to his earlier truth-telling that got him fired. He won’t help his boss keep his driver’s license, but he will protect a potential murderess without qualms. It is very typical for Christie’s brand of sudden romance that you can absolutely contemplate the one you love being a cold-blooded murderer of an old lady and protect her anyway. In a Ngaio Marsh novel MacWhirter would be certain of his lady’s innocence. But I find the whirlwind romances of GAD enjoyable, whatever the minor variations.

    But the book as a whole is not one of my favourites. I am in the camp that finds the clueing lacking. My favourite clue is the ringing of the bell. Lady T. does not remember why she wrung it, so a clever reader might wonder if Neville (who we are carefully told has just left the room) might have set up his alibi. Unfortunately there are not many more clues like that.

    Like

  3. Really enjoyed this conversation about one of my favorite Christie titles. Was glad to see at least one other reader out there found the “fish smell” clue a little…well…fishy. (Do you see what I did there?)

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.