#697: This Way Out (1939) by James Ronald

This Way Out frontstar filledstar filledstar filledstar filledstar filled
Malice Aforethought (1931) by Francis Iles, possibly the most famous novel of uxoricide ever written, begins with a line so classic it distracts you from the opening being, well, a bit dull. This Way Out (1939) by James Ronald, similarly concerned with a dissatisfied husband wishing to dispose of his wife, is happy for you to be immersed in the commonplace before hitting you with brilliant lines of its own, but would surely be more more famous if it began with the following from approximately a third of the way through: “While dawn on slippered feet crept through the silent streets Philip lay in bed examining schemes for killing his wife”.

Philip Marshall and his wife Cora have, in their 25 years of wedlock, made “a disgusting mess” of their married life.  He works as an office clerk, lying to her about his wages so she will not demand more and fritter it away on chocolates, while she waits at home, ready to pour bile in his ear at the slightest provocation, holding forth on “his weaknesses…his deficiencies as a money-maker…his failure as a lover” to the charwoman who cleans their house, the women she meets for tea, and just about anyone else who will listen.

It was years since they had looked at each other squarely.  Philip had a feeling that if they ever did something would break.

And the fact that Cora “might prefer to go on not being happy as long as she could make Philip miserable” — plus the knowledge of her “vitriolic tongue at his back like the tail of a kite” should he simply walk out on her is sufficient to preclude that as an option.  Divorce, too, is out of the picture (“I want to leave you.  Is that so surprising?” he implores her in a rare moment of spirit. “Or have you got to used to hell that you wouldn’t feel at home elsewhere?”) and, before too long, thoughts of murder will begin to circle.

The catalyst for this is, of course, a young woman who comes into Philip’s life quite by chance, but it’s refreshing that, unlike with Iles’ Edmund Bickley, Mary Grey isn’t simply a libidinous itch that Philip wishes to scratch.  For all Ronald’s frankness when discussing elements of sex — “Of course, you don’t sleep with Mr. Marshall, do you?” Cora is quizzed by one of her associates over tea.  “That makes all the difference.  You lose your hold on a man if you let him manage without you…” — it’s understood to be merely a “shabby anchor” when used to hold a relationship together and indeed “a damned poor foundation for anything” (this also might be the first GAD novel I’ve read in which a character is propositioned by a prostitute, which is an odd realisation).  No, when Mary’s presence begins to bend Philip’s mind in the direction or murder it’s almost a desperate scream in the wilderness, the last gasp out of a drowning sea for a man who simply sees the opportunity to do a noble thing and doesn’t want to be held back by his previous mistakes.

Plot-wise, then, this unfolds in the expected way.  Philip plans and commits the murder, an investigation is begun, and the threads of his happiness and his moral responsibility become ever-more entwined.  Ground-breaking it may not be, but what compels this for me is the writing, and  how brilliantly Ronald sidesteps all histrionics to give an unvarnished story of a disappointed life that finally has a chance to count for something.  Whether reflecting on buildings in the City left derelict at the end of a working day…

They had not always been rushed into at 9 a.m., rushed out of at 6 p.m., left lonely through dusk, dark, and dawn.  Time was when prosperous city merchants were proud to live in them, when children’s voices echoed through the upper rooms, when good dinners were eaten and good wines drunk beneath their ornamented ceilings, when servants gossiped and grumbled in their basements, when dusk saw the square a-blaze with lights, when the hooves of sleek horses and the wheels of smart carriages beat lively rhythms on the cobbles at the hour when gentlemen were wont to dine.

…or the diluted effect of murder when perpetrated on the page…

Old ladies revel in printed pages dripping blood; but they don’t stop to think about what they’re reading, their eyes race on ravenously, avid for more thrills.  They read about a man’s brains being spattered on a wall by the impact of a bullet, but the grisly horror of it doesn’t sink in; they don’t see the picture, they only get the thrill.

…Ronald brings a piquancy to this writing that avoids the usual tepid inculcation of less gifted practitioners, investing Philip and his world with a mien that’s as distinctive as it is unspectacular.  There’s not here the frisson of hunter and hunted, just a steady, irrevocable purpose as his life moves through murder and tries to emerge on the other side, knowing that his victim will never truly leave him.

And Ronald’s character sketches are magnificent, too.  From the resigned wife of a barfly Philip helps home “upon whom has settled the chilling calm of the dead”, to Philip’s summary of his son’s fiancée having offered her a drink, to the response given by Mrs. Meggs, the aforementioned charwoman, when Cora complains that “I could have written my name in the dust on the dining room furniture” after her previous spate of cleaning (“Eddication’s a wonderful thing.”), to Helen’s landlady reflecting on having never had children, Ronald has a real skill with capturing the essence of someone — it strikes me now that these examples are all women — in the brief moments they get with a clarity that pages and pages of prose could not improve.

Philip’s son, John, is one of two meaningful exceptions here.  Driven from the family home by the fault-finding and callous criticism of his mother and telling his landlady that he’s an orphan to avoid any awkward questions, John comes to define the second half of the book.  The love between the father and son is observed with the sort of emotional reluctance men of this era would be expected to display, found mostly in small private moments like Philip packing up a box of belongings or John’s realisation that he cannot mourn his mother.  The relationship between Philip and John and Mary evolves in surprising ways, thankfully avoiding  the sort of development that most modern authors would throw in to show how ‘shocking’ they can be, and in turn gives Mary — the other exception — space for her own doubts, difficulties, and resolutions.  And, sure, the late chapter in which Philip reflects on his life to that point might be a bit overdone, but as a window onto a man we’ve spent a lot of time with I actually rather enjoyed the refusal to play it for easy lachrymose manipulation.

The police investigation we know must happen is very much in the background, but revolves around points that are undeniably telling and that we, the experienced readership, know can be spun into the correct, lethal conclusions.  I actually had an entirely different way for Philip’s guilt to be brought home to him with more conviction, but it’s very much not that kind of book.  We’re dipping a toe into Cornell Woolrich’s nightmarish Noirisms, but retaining enough classic ingredients to satisfy those of you who found much to enjoy in Edmund Bickley’s downfall — indeed, in my mind this should be mentioned in the same breath, because it’s every bit the classic.  It’s rare as hen’s teeth at present, but I’m tempted to see if I can improve that — Ronald has written at least three absolute belters, and in no way deserves the forgotten status he has achieved.  Watch this space…


Many of you will be aware that this novel was the basis of the Charles Laughton movie The Suspect (1944), and those of you who know me will be aware that I’m terrible at sitting down and watching movies and so — despite its presence on YouTube — I’ve not gotten round to watching it.  It’s the perfect material for a movie of that era, though — a real domestic tragedy with plenty to offer for an actor of Laughton’s range.  Probably worth a look, despite the inevitable changes that will have been made.

21 thoughts on “#697: This Way Out (1939) by James Ronald

  1. You’ve convinced me! I’ve got a copy of this book and a copy of Murder in the Family winging their way to me. There is the odd copy of both texts still available on ebay and abe books. Other titles by him also crop up but I think some of them are not mystery novels, based on the limited information I can find out about them.


    • Yes, the tricky thing with Ronald’s unavailability is that it’s also difficult to know what his other books are about. Certainly Medal for the General, The Sparks Fly Upwards (a.k.a. This is Temptation), Man Born of Woman, and The Angry Woman don’t appear to be criminous, though I reckon his prose is so darn good that they’d be worth reading nonetheless.

      However, you then have to contend with that fact that a lot of his stuff appears to have been published in abridged form, too, so it’s entirely possible to find one and then discover it’s not the full text…frankly, it’s a minefield. I shall navigate it for you all, just give me a bit of time 🙂


    • I’ve just talked myself into buying one of his for what I’m pretty sure is more money than I’ve ever spent on a book before…not quite $952.04, though. It amazes me that people out there have that sort of money to spend on books — not that the price being so high means anyone is likely to buy it, I just mean that there will be (probably signed) GAD novels that someone has the disposable income to drop $900+ on. Staggers me.

      Liked by 1 person

      • These buyers are ones who buy a book merely to put in a glass case…never to be read or enjoyed. They would be appalled at my mixed PB/HB, no dustjacket, ex-library, book club edition, glued spine, taped cover collection😁.


        • I will doubtless upset many people by saying this, but I find myself increasingly unwilling to buy old hardcover editions of books because they’ve frequently been kept in such lousy conditions and I don’t really want them on my shelves spreading mould, etc. Too many dodgy experiences in that vein, so I will always opt for a new(ish) paperback if I can. Exceptions obviously have to be made, but my collection is remarkably light on old hardcovers for someone who loves this genre and era of fiction as much as I do.

          Plus, y’know, I think most collectors would be more appalled at your purse made out of a gutted paperback 😄

          Liked by 1 person

          • Oh I’m pretty light on hardbacks myself. I will not by one unless I can personally see/touch/smell it. It amazes me what some people will try to sell as Good/VGood…and at outrageous prices.

            And speaking of outrageous prices…$72 for a wallet made from a book cover is way too pricey…even one of a JDC book cover!


    • I’m curious as to what makes a book like this — almost entirely forgotten, no DJ, probably no distinctive features at all, one of thousands of overlooked hardcovers churned out in the 1930s — worth that much to a seller. How do you arrive at that value for something it’s unlikely anyone was looking for, y’know?


      • It’s because of the movie THE SUSPECT which is something of a cult movie now. And for those who want a cheap hardcover you might be able to find a movie tie-in addition under that title. It used to go for $10 year ago. The French paperback editions are still cheap. For those who know the language that’s the one to get. Why is it that so many vintage French mystery novels are so cheap? If I read French I’d be in heaven. Boileau and Narcejac’s books available by the truckful, each one only a few Euros. Dirt cheap! And all those untranslated impossible crime books that appear on Roland Lacourbe’s list. […sigh…]


        • If I read Italian I’d be in heaven, because it seems that EVERYTHING has received an Italian translation at some point. Dammit — born not only in the wrong era but also the wrong place…


  2. I still have a gorgeously covered International Library edition of They Can’t Hang Me camping out at the very bottom of my TBR stack. I’m going to have to dabble in how to fix paperback binding before I attempt to read it though.


  3. Pingback: This Way Out (1948) by James Ronald – crossexaminingcrime

  4. Hi everyone! I’m not actually a connoisseur of crime novels but I have approached James Ronald from a totally different angle which has brought me here and if my hunch is correct we may have some insight into his life. I have a bizarre theory he could have been the ‘J.E.R.’ who was a columnist in the West Middlesex Gazette around 1933 – 1940. Very interesting essays, he was very socialist, also a lover of nature with a great interest in birds and insects, also very rebellious and anti church. I could be totally wrong of course but threads are suggesting themselves, James Ronald in the 1939 register born 11 May 1905 and living in Chiswick gave his occupations as ‘novelist, journalist, editor, political organiser’.
    I’m wondering if my theory could have any ground and how to verify?


  5. Pingback: El Sospechoso [This Way Out] by James Roland Traducción de Susana Carral, Editorial Reino de Cordelia – A Crime is Afoot

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.