I don’t think anyone would doubt that I’m out of my stated era of the Golden Age reviewing a book from 1961, and there isn’t even an impossibility in this one to justify it on those grounds. But Patricia Moyes’ debut Dead Men Don’t Ski (1959) was clothed in the fashions of GAD, and the series bears further investigation for that alone. This second novel is afflicted a little by the narrative periphrasis that betokens later-era crime writing — chapter one should be called ‘Here’s the Cast’ and chapter two ‘Sure, I Understand Sailing, But I Don’t Know How to Communicate It (Glossary of Terms)’ — but, once past that, things improve significantly.
It’s true that I generally find myself a little impatient for incident in my detective fiction, but Moyes burns a slow fuse very neatly: foul play in the recent death of sailor Pete Rawnsley, a key figure in the small boating commune of Berrybridge Haven, is first hinted at, with its impact and connotations felt among the people we meet, before the story is explicitly relayed and that second-chapter glossary comes in handy for maritime ingénue Henry Tibbett to have legitimate reason to suspect foul play.
“Oh, Henry — not again,” Emmy protested. “Can’t we have a single holiday in peace?”
One by one, motives begin to insinuate themselves among the gaps left in conversation — with hints at Rawnsley’s unyielding nature where the law was concerned, and his loose morals around women like the vivacious, tomboyish Anne Petrie — and soon everyone from harbour-master Herbert Hole and barman Bob Calloway to artist David Crowther and Colin Street, Anne’s fiancé, is in the frame for something suspicious.
“I see,” said Henry. “Any more suspects?”
“That’s all I can think of, off-hand,” said Colin. “Isn’t it enough?”
“Not for a really ingenious detective story,” said Henry, grinning.
This works partly on account of the community Moyes builds up, keeping a clear focus on the (yes, somewhat predictable) relationships in a well-defined group. Even the awkward, gentrified bonhomie of landed gentry Sir Simon Trigg-Willoughby, who seeks to involve himself as part of the community while also being “obviously not ill-pleased by the gratifying number of raised caps and tugged forelocks” that accompany his presence anywhere, plays a part in defining the tightness of the Berrybridge set. And the forthcoming mayoral election, in which four candidates are battling it out for a split of forty-seven votes, is yet another chance of grievances to be aired…albeit in hushed tones lest the people at the next table overhear and upset things for you.
And then, just as everything is gearing up nicely…ugh, it grinds to a halt. Chapters 8 and 9 can be skipped and should be titled ‘The Second Victim Loudly Provides Motives for Their Murder’, and then Henry keeps his suspicions to himself for no good reason other than Anne more or less throws herself at him and asks him to — it’s a little bit creepy, his behaviour here, given that he’s already ignored such a request from his loving wife and friends, and is so adamant about his reasons for pursuing such ends:
The coroner’s verdict had been perfectly straightforward. And yet…there were inconsistencies. Pick up a loose thread of circumstance, follow it through the labyrinth of events — and where would it lead? Perhaps to havoc and misery in the lives of a pleasant group of people. Better to leave it alone. If you can. If you can…
7 thoughts on “#529: Down Among the Dead Men, a.k.a. The Sunken Sailor (1961) by Patricia Moyes”
I plan to read more Moyes myself in the future. I think I’ve heard it said that this is one of the weaker ones though.
Huh, good to know, at least. If she’s pitching at about this level from now on I’d have to sell them on before anyone else caught on…
I feel like I don’t read enough GAD set in seaside villages. In fact, I’m scratching my head to think of any that I’ve read, even though I have this feeling that I have. Perhaps I watched too much Murder She Wrote as a kid.
Around a third of The Devil Drives is set in a coastal village. I suppose The Sea Mystery kind of starts in one.
Er…maybe Bleeding Hooks by Harriet Rutland? But I think that’s more of a fishing hotel.
Paul Halter’s The Man Who Loved Clouds, but that’s not GAD.
Yes, there are better Moyes novels than this one, but since you seem to be reading them in order of publication, I should warn you that Death on the Agenda is not one of them. It’s not . . . bad – nothing of Moyes’ is bad until the end, but it kind of just sits there, and I solved it pretty easily for a couple of reasons that I won’t go into until you have read it. Seasons of Snows and Sins is a good one, and it has a narrative structure that takes it out of the whole “let’s just copy the Golden/Silver Age” and more into modern writing. I seem to recall that Johnny Underground was more moving, dealing with Emmy’s past war work, and Who Is Simon Warwick? is a pretty nice take on the “Brat Ferrar” idea. Murder Fantastical is amusing in a Ngaio Marsh sort of way, if you like that sort of thing.
I think you make a great point about these writers who strive to mimic GAD – after Moyes it was Carolyn Hart and Jane Haddam and several others. There’s nothing wrong with their plotting or their writing, and often their characterization is quite rich. But a pattern is a pattern, and things got – for me, at least – rather leaden as I read some of these authors’ works. I liked Moyes – I read them all – but I I agree with your assessment of her.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Murder Fantastical is amusing in a Ngaio Marsh sort of way, if you like that sort of thing.
I rather famously don’t like that sort of thing, but we’ll cross that bridge when we come to it.
Thanks for the warning about Death on the Agenda; I’ll still make it my next Moyes, but shall not judge her too harshly on account of it. Murder a la Mode, the fourth book, got a few recommendations on Facebook, so I’ll review after that one and see how we stand. And then read another five or six anyway because why not.
There’s doubtless an assessment of post-GAD detection to be done in light of how it seems a pale mimesis of actual-GAD detection, but I suppose people who don’t go in for plot and mystery and just want something easy to pass their eye over at the end of a long day — and who can blame ’em — find that sort of thing more appealing. And fair enough, takes all sorts to make a world, I’m just not looking for that style of “mystery”.
LikeLiked by 1 person
That wee puzzle is a rebus.
LikeLiked by 1 person