No-one is more surprised than me to find self-published fiction forming a fairly regular part of my online book-scouting. The experience of reading Matt Ingwalson’s Owl and Raccoon novellas was quite transformative in my perception of this stream of literature, and recently stumbling into Robert innes’ prolific and entertaining output only strengthens my intention to keep digging.
Several candidates had presented themselves this time around, including The Play of Light and Shadow (2004) by Barry Ergang, but TomCat got to it before me, and The Patricide (2016) by Kim Ekemar, but Aidan ran an eye through that one first. Not that I’m averse to reviewing something already reviewed elsewhere — quite the reverse, else no-one is going to be able to talk about it — and both those works sound very interesting indeed and shall feature in this series in due course, but with so much self-published fiction coming onto the market every week it’s nice to turn the light on someone not yet examined by our coterie. All of which brings us to The Murder of Nora Winters (2016) by Robert Trainor.
Robert Trainor is another prolific self-published author, with several titles to his name across something of a spread of genres. I’ll be honest, even had he not written an impossible crime I’d’ve been somewhat intrigued by the following in his author bio:
What I am attempting to do in my books, besides writing entertaining and original plots, is to present themes and dilemmas that are thought provoking and don’t have any easy, simplistic answers. I do my very best to fairly present both sides of an issue–such as having a negative character express my own personal views, while a more positive character will express intelligent opposition to those views. All of this occurs, of course, in relation to the plots that are contained in the books, which are intended to mirror or illustrate the underlying philosophy.
I mean, that’s a pretty interesting stall to set out from the very beginning. From a scan of his synopses this would appear to be his only impossible crime story to date, and quite a doozy it sounds:
On Christmas morning, Nora Winters is found shot to death in her bedroom. … The police are completely baffled by the case because it has all the elements of a classic locked-room murder mystery. The only door to the room has a deadbolt and two sliding steel bolts that are fully engaged; the two windows are securely locked from the inside of the room; and after an extensive and thorough investigation, no hidden panels in the floor, walls, or ceiling can be found. Sure, Nora Winters might have let her killer into her bedroom, but how did he leave? And the gun…the very puzzling position of the gun. Why had it been left behind two books at the far end of the room?
Interesting review. Thanks for sharing (and for the link to my Patricide review). This novel does sound promising and I plan on checking it out.
LikeLike
Had Trainor written another impossible crime, I’d be lining that up right now — that’s how much I enjoyed this. Those flaws are very real, but, well, he’s far from the first author to fail to describe something crucial well, and at least he has the consideration of not going through a professional edit or having diagram-drawers on contract to provide such things with relative ease.
I’d love to know what you make of this when you get to it — and I shall hopefully get to The Patricide before too long so we can compare notes on that one, too. Next up in self-publishing for me, though, will be the third Robert Innes title.
LikeLiked by 1 person
How Christmassy is the stuff set around Christmas morning? I ask as someone planning a week of Christmas-themed mystery reviews…
LikeLike
The Christmas stuff is so incidental it took me a moment to realise what you were talking about; essentially, Christmas is the framing device for the “get everyone together” initiation of the plot. It could equally have been Thanksgiving, a birthday, a Summer Solstice pagan meeting, some sort of family intervention given how separated they’ve all become, or even a letter sent to each of them from a U.N. Owen remembering all the fond times they’ve had and hoping they’ll meet again soon…
LikeLike
Thanks for the information! It doesn’t affect whether I read it – just what time of year. 🙂
LikeLike
If you’re planning Christmas-timed stories, I believe Arrest the Bishop? by Winifred Peck is also a Christmassy murder mystery. At least I hope it is, since I’m planning on reading my copy of that at Christmastime…
LikeLike
Thanks! I own a copy of that already so I will add it to the shortlist.
LikeLike
Arrest the Bishop? takes place during Christmas, but is more of a wintry mystery than a holiday detective. One title that’s often overlooked as a Christmas mystery is Ellery Queen’s The Finishing Stroke and you might want to give Bush another try in December with the excellent Dancing Death.
Are we seriously exchanging ideas for Christmas in July? Why can’t we just wait until September or October. You know, like normal people.
LikeLike
🤣
LikeLike
Interesting review! I came across this book before, but, like was the case with The Message in a Bottle, the cover and self-published status were very off-putting. So good to know that this one, in spite of its short comings, is worth a read and will use your review as a proper excuse to add it to my holiday reading list. Thanks for feeding my mystery addiction, JJ!
I’m also planning to give both Robert Innes and Kim Ekemar a shot, one of these days, but have to knock a couple of other titles from my pile before I can get to them. Nevertheless, they’re coming!
LikeLike
It’s weird how the cover can have such a large effect on the decision to pick something up, isn’t it? Entirely irrational — which, when you consider we consider ourselve rational people, is moderately amusing — but nevertheless true.
Well, worry not. I wonder how much you’ll agree with me on this, but I hope you’ll see what’s laudable about this even if the eventual result isn’t to your liking (and I’m not saying it won’t be — we should give up trying to predict what the other thinks about a book we’ve read…!).
And with you picking up the Ekemar and Aidan trying this one, I will as mentioned above commit to the Ekemar and the Ergang stories in the future of this series. And to think when I started doing these that I wasn’t even sure how long I’d be able to keep it going…! Weird how things turn out.
LikeLike
I’ve just learned something I didn’t know… that there is such a genre as ‘impossible crimes’
LikeLike
Oh, good heavens, there’s a whole world ahead of you…!
LikeLike
I remain resolutely resistant to self published books, I won’t read any. The lack of an editor is a blight on most modern crime writing, even for writers with established publishers. (It seems like Rendell dropped using an editor for a decade or more.) Hemingway had an editor, Thomas Mann had an editor, Vonnegut had an editor.
LikeLike
I had the same objection at first, and then I started realising how poor the editing felt in a large number of the modern crime novels I was reading. I agree that there’s often a need to have someone run through what you’re writing, but it’s be no means necessary (the Matt Ingwalson novellas that got me started on this route are exquisitely written and paced).
And the more I started thinking about it, the more I realised how much of a sweeping generalisation I was making: “all self-published fiction is terrible”. I tend to mistrust generalisations, and so thought I should therefore take the plunge. And, hey, you never know, I may find something that piques your curiosity… 🙂
LikeLike
Not much of a generalization really. Most of what is written is not worth reading. I use filters to try to skim off some of the cream and find what is. So now I pass over 100 out of 101 instead of 99 out of 100. Some of my filters/prejudgment are stronger still. There might be a wonderful book with “James Patterson” emblazoned upon it but I will never know …
LikeLike
There might be a wonderful book with “James Patterson” emblazoned upon it but I will never know …
Oh, sure; hell, every time we pass up on something there’s a chance we’re overlooking something that could have been one of our favourite books of all time. We have to do this, because the only other option is to read everything, and that’s actually not an option — so it’s just a case of veing comfortable with how slim the chances are realistically. I might love the works of Sophis Kinsella, but they don’t sound like my genre and so I’m going to pass them over. Could be my loss, maybe they’re exactly my kind of thing, but thousands and thousands (and thousands and thousands and thousands…) of hours reading over my life to date reasure me that’s not the case.
I totally get where you’re coming from, and I pass up a staggering majority of the self-published stuff I read about (though I’m aided in most of it not featuring impossivble crimes, which is where my interest lies — so I guess I’m already skewing the sample and excluding the deeply terrible-sounding stuff which gives so much SP fiction a bad rap…). My point was simply that you’ll get a good idea of the kind of thing I like from this bog, and so maybe that will convince you to give something SP which I really like a go at some point. Maybe it won’t — but at least you’ll have some filtering to help you out if it does 🙂
LikeLike
Debated getting this, but decided to opt for your other self pub reviewed stuff due to the fact this one is not fully fair play, which puts me off. Would you be able to share the solution or what fact is hidden from the reader that makes the solution not possible?
LikeLike
If I remember correctly, the relative position of things to other things isn’t made clear, and so it’s impossible to truffle out the solution ahead of time. A floor-plan would have helped, but that aside this is a very good little mystery.
LikeLike