In much the same way that Hercule Poirot, Peter Wimsey, Roger Sheringham, and all other unofficial detectives of the Golden Age were unable to step out of their front doors without stumbling into some criminal enterprise, so The Three Investigators, The Hardy Boys, The Secret Seven, The Famous Five, and all others of their ilk always found themselves embroiled in shenanigans of one kind or another no matter where they went.
Yes! The Tuesday Night Bloggers have returned! And this month’s topic is Children in Crime; be they victims, perpetrators, bystanders, or sleuths, we’re onto it. And with Blyton’s forays into youthful adventure among the most popular of this kind of thing, I thought I’d take a look at one and see what occurred to me.
It’s interesting to note just how many of the tropes of classic detective and adventure fiction it’s possible to find in the Famous Five books: here there’s a secret passage, a ‘most obvious suspect’ reversal, and the ‘surprising’ resurrection of a character believed dead, but elsewhere you’ll find evil-does masquerading as harmless types, a fairly decent least-likely suspect or two, even the use of identical twins to explain away some confusion…in short, if you’re looking for it, there’s a huge amount of crossover.
Not that this is all that surprising when you come to think about it – the nature of these stories inevitably puts them on the same plinth as classic detective fiction, just with the ‘detective’ part reduced and the ‘adventure’ element lifted an extra notch or two. They’re still full of situations that must be taken seriously – kidnappings, theft, illegal activities, and in this particular book there’s even a sniff of international intrigue – but we’re dealing very much with a decidedly more jolly-what-ho-lashings-of-ginger-beer style adventure rather than an outright threatening crime. Instead of danger, what we’re usually given is trepidation – the Five never investigate an out-and-out murder, or a series of poison pen letters, or the theft of over a million pounds from the accounts of a respected cosmetics firm – and while they often find themselves in some kind of risky situation, the way it is handled is very interesting.
In FGIaF, Julian, Dick, Anne, and George descend from their life of white middle-class privilege to go skiing and tobogganing in the Welsh mountains. Over the course of their stay they unearth some unpleasantness at a nearby house and, of course, resolve everything in time for cake and big smiles come the end. As usual, this requires that they go up again a criminal enterprise engineered and run by adults, and of course the nature of the threat presented must be such that it a) is actually threatening but b) can semi-realistically be resolved by a group of meddling kids and their dog. Simply dropping them into a room full of toughs holding guns would provide a) but not b), and so what is needed is evidence of their ability to deal with a) in a way that provides b) come the end.
I think of this as the comfort/threat/comfort model: everything seems fine, then a threat presents itself and is swiftly dispatched, then we move on almost as if it didn’t happen. The ability to cope with a small threatening situation therefore lays groundwork for the larger threats to come.
There is, as always, the chance I’m slightly over-analysing this.
So, two examples: early on, having reached the idyllic farm of old Mrs. Jones and her mountain of a son Morgan, George takes Timmy (the dog, in case you’re unaware) out to meet some of the dogs owned by Morgan. The dogs face off, Timmy is nipped on the neck by one of them, and George jumps in to defend him, the dogs are called off, everything is fine. And then the following, hugely unusual, combination of emotions is written:
[Dick] couldn’t help thinking what would have happened if the three savage dogs had bitten George instead of Timmy. Good old George! She was as brave as a lion!
Now, sorry, but the second and third sentences there do not belong after the first in any normal sense. Instead it’s the slow and careful accumulation of a sense of danger – there is a threat, the consequences of which are considered (never stated mind, just considered), and then Good old George is as brave a lion and so everything must be fine – and events move on. Timmy’s wound s swiftly dismissed, though George continues to fret, but the immediate situation is safe again and Morgan’s dogs are set up as a linger sense of background menace to cast a vague miasma of disquietude over proceedings.
I wouldn’t buy into this myself if we didn’t also get this exchange between Julian and Dick about twenty pages later:
“Gosh – she’s absolutely fearless, isn’t she? I’ll never forget her standing up to those three savage dogs! I was jolly scared myself.”
“I’m going to get a rug and wrap it round me and sit out on the doorstep in the sun,” said Dick. “That view is too marvellous for words!”
Great post JJ. Having never read any of The Famous Five Books, I’d never really considered how they compare or interact with fully fledged detective novels though. Though from the extracts you’ve given I could see myself chuckling a lot at ‘jolly-what-ho-lashings-of-ginger-beer style’.
LikeLike
There is a lot of jolly hockey sticks and nonsense at times (at the climax here, they’re dispatched the fetch the police with the situation still not fully resolved and legitimately have to have a conversation about whether or not to stop and eat their sandwiches while en route…idiocy like that). But they’re a very innocent and fun way to pass an hour or two. Well, each one would probably take you more like 40 minutes…
LikeLike
This is great, JJ. I never encountered the Famous Five until I had my son. He loved listening to their books on tape from the library.
LikeLike
I was always a Faraway Tree kid, so it’s been quite entertaining discovering them with my Classic Detective Fiction hat on. Weird how much they do fulfil so many of the requirements, though…
LikeLike
I grew up on Nancy Drew, the Hardy Boys and Trixie Belden (primarily) with Encyclopedia Brown and the Three Investigators thrown in for good measure.
It is true that children’s detective stories meet so many of the requirements–I hadn’t given it a lot of thought before you pointed it out though.
LikeLike
Pingback: Tuesday Night Bloggers: Children in Crime: Week 1 | crossexaminingcrime
I remember loving these books when I was young. I think one reason they were so popular was that the Five had complete freedom to go off on their own and have adventures, largely without the intervention of adults. How we kids longed for that freedom! Blyton also wrote The Secret Seven series (very similar to the Famous Five) and many school stories.
The Comic Strip made a very funny spoof of the Famous Five in 1982 called ‘Five Go Mad in Dorset’ which was shown in the UK on Channel 4. Well worth watching if you can find it.
LikeLike
Discovering these as an adult has been an interesting experience — I didnt get on with the first one, but find some really lovely writing in the others, simplistic though they may be. I’m not sure you’d be free to leave four children to play with a stray dog as frequently as happens here wtihout attracting some Social Services attention, too… 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person