#1109: The Alarm of the Black Cat (1942) by Dolores Hitchens [a.p.a. by D.B. Olsen]

Alarm Black Cat

star filledstar filledstar filledstarsstars
The Cat Saw Murder (1939), Dolores Hitchens’ first book featuring septuagenarian spinster sleuth Rachel Murdock, saw Miss Rachel move into some vacant accommodation following a vague suspicion only for murder to occur and our protagonist to slowly put together the pieces based on her observation of the sundry types living around her, achieved with the help of her black cat Samantha. The Alarm of the Black Cat (1941), the second Miss Rachel novel, also does this, and exposes what I feel might be a recurrent flaw in this series going forward: namely that Hitchens is superb at suspense, but sorely lacks when it comes to plot construction and detection.

It is while arbitrarily wasting the time of letting agents, asking to be shown around houses she has no intention of renting, that Miss Rachel first observes 8 year-old Claudia Byers burying a toad in the garden. When it becomes apparent that the toad was killed deliberately, and apparently left for Claudia to find, Miss Rachel decides to rent the house for a month and…observe, I guess. As it happens, the house is the centre of a variety of tangles: Claudia lives on one side with her father, aunt, and paternal grandfather, while her great-grandmother, grandmother, and maternal grandfather live on the other side. Previously, Claudia’s parents had occupied Miss Rachel’s house, and her father might have been having an affair with the woman who lives behind, to whom he was engaged before marrying Annie Hayes, who died aged seventeen while giving birth to Claudia.

There’s…a lot going on here.

The plot, then, essentially concerns people showing up in Miss Rachel’s house — sometimes carrying a gun, sometimes trying to creep in through a window, oftentimes simply appearing when Miss Rachel has been out or asleep — and it feels like at least half of the resulting difficulties could have been avoided if she’d just lock her doors. When one of these incursions results in a dead body, Lieutenant Mayhew enters into proceedings and we’re basically in the first book again, only with fewer culprits to choose from.

On a sentence-by-sentence level, I enjoy Hitchens’ writing…

But sleep she did, eventually, and perhaps much for the best. There was little she could have done to help what happened that night, and to have been awake would almost certainly have guaranteed her own death.

…and she conjures well the fears of an old woman living alone in a house where murder has been committed, even if it is difficult to then reconcile said old woman withholding evidence from the police just because she thinks they have some sort of unfair advantage when it comes to catching murderers…I mean, pick a lane. What’s less successful is the need for all these actions to fold into a coherent plot, with much of what unfurls feeding the steady stream of suspense that Hitchens has going but then making little sense when it comes to the eventual answer — surely some of this was done purely to provide suspense for a reader than because it helped further the villain’s (rather pedestrian) aim.

Perhaps the oddest thing about the entire book concerns the eponymous cat, Samantha, jointly owned by Miss Rachel and her sister Jennifer, and taken along to these crime scenes to provide company for our spinster detective. In The Cast Saw Murder she is described as a “black satin cat”, which makes sense given the title of this one…except here she’s repeatedly referred to as being “marmalade” in colour, and even “orange” at one point. She’s the only cat in the entire book, as was black originally, so it’s not like my too-literal mind is struggling to grasp some literary allusion, so what the heck is going on? The mind boggles.

Two books in to this series, and with fourth title — not third, I checked — The Cat Wears a Noose (1944) on its way in the American Mystery Classics range, I have to say that I’ve read about as much of the Rachel Murdock mysteries as I feel compelled to right now. Hitchens has done well to imagine the burgeoning Domestic Suspense genre and attempt to tie it into something approaching detection, but for me there’s not enough coherence or invention, and certainly not enough intelligent deduction — the word is misused herein in a manner that made me hoot — to warrant further time spent in this universe. I mean, I’m kind of curious to see whether Samantha becomes calico or tortoiseshell in future volumes, but that alone does not a valid reading experience make.

12 thoughts on “#1109: The Alarm of the Black Cat (1942) by Dolores Hitchens [a.p.a. by D.B. Olsen]

  1. The GAD blogosphere continues to help me separate the ‘gems’ from the ‘mountain of rocks’. After reading your review as well as several others of Hithchens’ books, I will give this her work a miss. Whilst we all appreciate different things, there are just too many excellent books in my TBR mountain that should take priority over an author (at least to me) who sounds good but not great.

    Liked by 1 person

    • The republishing of a series like this is always going to pique interest, just in case something fabulous has been overlooked all these years. And while there’s doubtless an audience for these books, I don’t count myself among them, so will happily leave them to others. If it helps cull potential distractions for others, more’s the better!

      Liked by 1 person

  2. I’ve read two of the Rachel Murdock books, though not this one. I enjoyed some of the writing but I wasn’t particularly impressed by the mystery plots or how Rachel solved them.

    Liked by 1 person

    • I’d be interested to see how Hitchens’ writing outside this series stands up — her sentence-by-sentence prose is very nice and very readable, but her plotting…not so much. But maybe she excels when freed from the obligation of feline shenanigans.

      Expect a return to Hitchens if the AMC republish any of her other standalones, but based on comments like yours I’m happy to let these books rest.

      Liked by 1 person

      • It’s always a little difficult for me to decide if I will read more books of a series that strikes me as mildly entertaining, that I like in a lukewarm sort of way. I wouldn’t rule out reading another, but I wouldn’t feel I was really missing out if I never did.

        Liked by 1 person

        • Yes, I think you’ve nailed my feelings here rather well. Maybe in a few years I’ll get curious an leaf through another one of these, but not with any high hopes, and I’m not exactly counting the days until that time 🙂

          Liked by 1 person

          • I’m not sorry I read two of them, because I made a conscious decision to try at least two books of each new (to me) GAD author I’m trying unless I find the idea unbearable. I always wonder what would’ve happened had my first Christie been The Big Four instead of The Murder of Roger Ackroyd.

            Liked by 1 person

            • Yes, it’s difficult to know when to cut an author off, isn’t it? Easier when they have a small oeuvre, but these 60-book writers can be a nightmare — I think it took me about eight or ten novels before I finally saw the appeal of E.C.R. Lorac.

              Liked by 1 person

  3. I’ve figured out the mystery of the cat!

    In her 70’s, my grandmother bought herself a luxurious silver wig to wear at fancy events and hide her less voluminous or nicely greyed real hair. Clearly Miss Rachel has done the same for the aging Samantha and will continue to do so throughout the series. It’s just the sort of lunacy a woman who acts as Rachel does here would do to her pet.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Jim, this made me die laughing! I think I’ll swerve these books but your critique is pure magic! And I loved your observations about the cat…

      “The plot, then, essentially concerns people showing up in Miss Rachel’s house — sometimes carrying a gun, sometimes trying to creep in through a window, oftentimes simply appearing when Miss Rachel has been out or asleep — and it feels like at least half of the resulting difficulties could have been avoided if she’d just lock her doors.”

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.