Ten more cases for America’s Sherlock Holmes in Sneakers, Leroy ‘Encyclopedia’ Brown — how many do you think he’ll solve? What’s that? Oh, I suppose the title is something of a giveaway, hey? Well, moving on, then…
First, ‘The Case of the Missing Clues’ is an alibi problem as classic as anything from the Golden Age: Bugs Meany — this universe’s Skinny Norris, head of a gang of older boys who call themselves The Tigers but “should have called themselves the Berries [because] they were always getting into one jam after another” — can’t possibly have stolen Abner Nelson’s bag of cherries, can he? Sure, there’s a bag of cherries right there in his clubhouse, but they’ve been right there along with Bugs all afternoon, and he’s been nowhere near Abner nor his fruit stand.
“You two guys better not walk too close to a candy factory. They’re looking for nuts like you.”
Funny how memory works – we must have had this book as part of a three-in-one yet from the descriptions I only remember Hair-Dryers, which Iiked, and Cupid’s Arrow which I had the same reservations over as you. But then the judo and Hercules pictures jump out at me and they are so familiar.
I never had the patience to try to solve these but there was one I got which I remember fondly and one that I’ve learnt something from that I’ve never forgotten.
LikeLike
I like how it’s the ones that make you impatient that are often the cleverest. That dog shooting…man, I should’ve seen that, but I was too busy huffing at the time being taken to get to the details, unaware that we were indeed at the details.
LikeLike
You may enjoy this:
https://www.theonion.com/idaville-detective-encyclopedia-brown-found-dead-in-lib-1819567098
LikeLiked by 1 person
Nice. I especially like “Brown’s salary, $.25 per day plus expenses, will be placed in a fund to establish a criminology scholarship in his name at Idaville University.”
LikeLike
Another classic of this genre is “Wikipedia Brown and the Case of the Captured Koala” (click through the arrows at the bottom to continue reading):
http://adamcadre.ac/content/brown/
LikeLike
“They called themselves the Tigers. They should have been called The Heathens. They were doomed to eternal torment in a subterranean lake of fire.”
😆😆😆😆
That was fabulous — thanks, Jack,.
LikeLike
I loved it too, Jack! It reminded me of the National Lampoon spoof of the Hardy Boys called Chums in the Dark, which I will not link here because it’s highly adult in nature. But it is available to read online and it’s hilarious.
LikeLike
Given that it’s the National Lampoon we’re talking about, I’d say it’s more likely ‘highly *adolescent* in nature’, if you know what I mean (and I’m sure you do). 😉
LikeLiked by 1 person
“Highly adolescent” is pretty grown-up for Brad’s usual idiom of expression, though 😄
LikeLiked by 1 person
That was brilliant, Scott! Thanks for sharing it. The principle of esoteric domestic and historical knowledge being the foundation for most of these cases worked for a lot of the adult versions – the Minute Mysteries, Two Minute Mysteries, Five Minute Mysteries, and so on – that I enjoyed. I matched wits with Inspector Fordney, and had to remember that only helium balloons rise and that a chocolate bar melts in a backpack on a hot day, but I discovered a lot of historical, anthropological and sociological facts, all I’ve which I’ve probably stored deep inside my head (in other words, forgotten) . . . except how women button up their coats differently from men.
LikeLiked by 1 person
That kind of clueing can be fun, except that I consider it something of second tier clueing because — unless it really is something we already knew— it does not offer us the power of being surprised by something that was “before our eyes all the time.“ There is no “of course!” attached to learning for the first time that a chef’s hat has exactly 100 pleats or that New York was briefly named New Orange. There’s edification, but no sense of inevitability, as there is in a clue such as “everything tastes foul today!” or that the emperor’s snuff box wouldn’t be recognized as such from a distance. I’m not suggesting that special knowledge clues have no place in the genre, merely pointing out why I consider them categorically inferior to such clues as behavioral discrepancies and knowledge limitation clues. Some of my favorite whodunits include specialty knowledge clues, but those that PRIMARILY consist of them (e.g. Murder on the Orient Express), I generally rate lower than those built primarily from other types of clueing (Death on the Nile, After the Funeral, Five Little Pigs)
LikeLike
Yeah, I agree with you, Scott, and I think that’s why the best of these work so well — the clues are rooted in actions and occurrences that you need to be wise to, and there’s the fun of having missed them. The “negative evidence” of the first story here is an easy one to spot, but it also roots the revelation in the best kind of reveal: it’s unlikely someone consume eat the cherry stones and stalks when eating cherries, but not so unlikely as to be rendered impossible…thus, the information of their absence is there for you to appreciate without it falling into the “over-specialised knowledge” category that does, I agree, somewhat deflate some of the answers.
The US military knowledge required herein is a perfect example — I could guess that it had something to do with that, since that’s the only real possible root of the solution, but it relies on too much awareness beyond the scope of the story.
LikeLike
I absolutely agree. Familiarity with the Cyrillic alphabet should not be a prerequisite for any story, so clues like that one should not bring about “major” revelations. Forensic knowledge should be parsed out to the reader sufficiently enough that he can make proper use of it when the time is right.
LikeLike
Forensic knowledge should be parsed out to the reader sufficiently enough that he can make proper use of it when the time is right.
John Rhode’s 283 novels would, respectfully, like to disagree…
LikeLike
Yes, I think it’s a matter of how central to the solution a specialized clue is, or what percentage of the revelations they constitute. There are a few too many in MOTOE for my taste, especially in the adaptations, where the best behavioral discrepancy clue (taking a sleeping draught on the same night you put a gun under your pillow) has almost always been left out.
But again, I certainly don’t think this kind of clue should be verboten, especially as a supplementary clue. I just don’t think they constitute the absolute best clues, because the “before my face the whole time” aspect is as key to the appeal of the genre as surprise.
LikeLike
To a certain extent, this is why I never got the appeal of the series House — as much as the medicine may have been correct (and I say “may” advisedly, because I have no idea one way or the other) there was rarely if ever the chance for the viewers to engage with it. Only those with a specialised medical knowledge, or who had experienced the same symptoms for the same disease themselves, need apply. And yet it was the biggest show in the universe at one point…
LikeLike
Excellent – and I know who killed Encyclopedia! At least in the world of the books – I don’t think the evidence would stand up in court.
LikeLike
You brought up a lot of memories with this one. I don’t recall the ins and outs of all of the stories, but each summary knocked loose the dust on a memory that I can’t believe is still kicking around back there.
LikeLike